Democracy as compromise: An alternative to the agonistic vs. epistemic divide | Dalaqua | Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia

Democracy as compromise: An alternative to the agonistic vs. epistemic divide

Gustavo Hessmann Dalaqua


The agonistic vs. epistemic dichotomy is fairly widespread in contemporary democratic theory and is endorsed by scholars as outstanding as Luis Felipe Miguel, Chantal Mouffe, and Nadia Urbinati. According to them, the idea that democratic deliberation can work as a rational exchange of arguments that aims at truth is incompatible with the recognition of conflict as a central feature of politics. In other words, the epistemic approach is bound to obliterate the agonistic and conflictive dimension of democracy. This article takes this dichotomized way of thinking to task by reconstructing the association between democracy and compromise made by John Stuart Mill, John Morley, and Hans Kelsen. It concludes that the conceptualization of democracy as compromise offers an alternative to the agonistic vs. epistemic divide that disconcerts a significant part of political philosophy today.

Texto completo:

PDF (English)


ACCETTI, C. I. et al. “Debating representative democracy.” Contemporary Political Theory, Vol. 15, Nr. 2, pp. 205-242, 2016.

ANKERSMIT, F. R. “Political Representation.” Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002.

BAUME, S. “What place should compromise be given in democracy? A reflection on Hans Kelsen’s contribution.” Négociations, Vol. 27, Nr. 1, pp. 73-89, 2017.

BELLAMY, R. “Liberalism and Pluralism: Towards a Politics of Compromise.” London: Routledge, 1999.

______. “Majority rule, compromise and the democratic legitimacy of referendums.” Swiss Political Science Review, Vol. 24, Nr. 3, pp. 312-319, 2018.

BURKE, E. “The Political Philosophy of Edmund Burke.” Harlow: Longman, 1987.

BURROW, J. W. “Whigs and Liberals: Continuity and Change in English Political Thought.” Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988.

CANIVEZ, P. “Democracy and compromise.” In: D. M. Gabbay et al. (eds.). Approaches to Legal Rationality. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010, pp. 97-118.

CARLISLE, J. “Mr. J. Stuart Mill, M. P., and the character of the working classes.” In: E. Eisenach (ed.). Mill and the Moral Character of Liberalism. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania University Press, 1999, pp. 143-168.

CONANT, J. “The dialectic of perspectivism, II.” Sats – Nordic Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 7, Nr. 1, pp. 6-57, 2006.

DALAQUA, G. H. “Democracy and truth: A contingent defense of epistemic democracy.” Critical Review, Vol. 29, Nr. 1, pp. 49-71, 2017.

______. “What makes representative constructivism democratic?”. PERI, Vol. 10, Nr. 2, pp. 100-122, 2018.

______. “Democracia representativa, consenso e conflito em J. S. Mill.” Tese de Doutorado em Filosofia. Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas, Universidade de São Paulo, 2019.

DISCH, L. “The ‘constructivist turn’ in democratic representation.” Constellations, Vol. 22, Nr. 4, pp. 487-489, 2015.

ESTLUND, D. “Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework.” Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008.

FOSSEN, T. “Agonistic critiques of liberalism: Perfection and emancipation.” Contemporary Political Theory, Vol. 7, Nr. 4, pp. 376-394, 2008.

FRÍAS, S. C. “John Stuart Mill: Un modelo ético y antropológico de democracia.” Τelos: Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios Utilitaristas, Vol. 15, Nr. 1, pp. 53-84, 2006.

FUMURESCU, A. “Compromise: A Political and Philosophical History.” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.

GUTMANN, A. and THOMPSON, D. “The Spirit of Compromise: Why Governing Demands It and Campaigning Undermines It.” Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2012.

HABERMAS, J. “Mudança estrutural da esfera pública: Investigações sobre uma categoria da sociedade burguesa.” Trans. D. L. Werle. São Paulo: Editora Unesp, 2014.

HUME, D. “Treatise of Human Nature.” Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 1992.

KAHAN, A. “Liberalism in Nineteenth-century Europe.” Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.

KELSEN, H. “Foundations of democracy.” Ethics, Vol. 66, Nr. 1, pp. 1-101, 1955.

______. “O problema do parlamentarismo.” In: A democracia. Trans. V. Barkow. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2000, pp. 109-136.

______. “The Essence and Value of Democracy.” Trans. B. Graf. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2013.

LANDEMORE, H. “Beyond the fact of disagreement? The epistemic turn in deliberative democracy.” Social Epistemology, Vol. 31, Nr. 3, pp. 277-295, 2017.

MARGALIT, A. “On Compromise and Rotten Compromises.” Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010.

McCORMICK, J. P. “Carl Schmitt’s Critique of Liberalism: Against Politics as

Technology.” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

McNAY, L. “The Misguided Search for the Political.” Cambridge: Polity Press, 2014.

MIGUEL, L. F. “Democracia e representação: Territórios em disputa.” São Paulo: Editora Unesp, 2014.

______. “O liberalismo e o desafio das desigualdades.” In: L. F. Miguel (ed.). Desigualdades e democracia: O debate da teoria política. São Paulo: Editora Unesp, 2016. pp. 25-66.

______. “Consenso e conflito na democracia contemporânea.” São Paulo: Editora Unesp, 2017.

______. “Dominação e resistência: Desafios para uma política emancipatória.” São Paulo: Boitempo, 2018.

MIHAI, M. “Theorizing agonistic emotions.” Parallax, Vol. 20, Nr. 2, pp. 31-48, 2014.

MILL, J. S. “The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill.” 33 Vols. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1963-1991.

MILLER, J. 2005. “Chairing the Jamaica Committee: J. S. Mill and the limits of colonial authority.” In B. Schultz and G. Varouxakis (eds.). Utilitarianism and Empire. Oxford: Lexington Books, 2005. pp. 155-178.

MORLEY, J. “On Compromise.” London: Macmillan, 1898.

MOUFFE, C. 2000. “The Democratic Paradox.” London: Verso, 2000.

MOUFFE, C. and URBINATI, N. “Discutono di democrazia rappresentativa e conflittuale.” Il Mulino, Vol. 58, Nr. 5, pp. 807-821, 2009.

PITTS, J. “A Turn to Empire: The Rise of Imperial Liberalism in Britain and France.” Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005.

RORTY, R. “Philosophy as Cultural Politics: Volume 4: Philosophical Papers.”

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

ROSANVALLON, P. "Le moment Guizot." Paris: Gallimard, 1985.

______. "Le peuple introuvable : Histoire de la représentation démocratique en France." Paris: Gallimard, 1998.

ROSTBØLL, C. F. “Democratic respect and compromise.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, Vol. 20, Nr. 5, pp. 619-635, 2017.

SANI, G. “Consenso.” In: N. Bobbio, N. Matteucci, and G. Pasquino (eds.). Dizionario di politica. Turino: UTET, 1983, pp. 226-228.

SCHMITT, C. “The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy.” Trans. E. Kennedy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1985.

______. “The Concept of the Political: Expanded Edition.” Trans. G. Schwab. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.

STEPHEN, J. F. “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity.” Indianopolis: Liberty Fund, [1874] 1993.

TAMBAKAKI, P. “Agonism and the crisis of representative democracy.” In: A. Azmanova and M. Mihai (eds.). Reclaiming Democracy: Judgment, Responsibility and the Right to Politics. London: Routledge, 2015, pp. 17-33.

TEN, C. L. “Mill on Liberty.” Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980.

THUCYDIDES. “História da Guerra do Peloponeso.” Trans. M. G. Kury. Brasília: Editora da Universidade de Brasília, 1982.

THOMPSON, D. “Mill in parliament: When should a philosopher compromise?” In: N. Urbinati and A. Zakaras (eds.). J. S. Mill’s Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007, pp. 166-199.

URBINATI, N. “Mill on Democracy: From the Athenian Polis to Representative Government.” Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.

______. “Representative Democracy: Principles & Genealogy.” Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006.

______. “Democracy Disfigured: Opinion, Truth, and the People.” Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.

URBINATI, N. and ACCETTI, C. I. “Editors’ introduction.” In: H. Kelsen. The Essence and Value of Democracy. Trans. B. Graf. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2013, pp. 1-24.

VINX, L. “Hans Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law: Legality and Legitimacy.” Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.

WENMAN, M. “Agonistic Democracy: Constituent Power in the Era of Globalisation.” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.

WILLIAMS, R. “Consensus.” In: Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. Revised edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983, pp. 76-78.

WINGENBACH, E. “Institutionalizing Agonistic Democracy: Post-foundationalism and Political Liberalism.” Surrey: Ashgate, 2011.

ZERILLI, L. M. G. “A Democratic Theory of Judgment.” Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2016.